Peer Reviews

From Mp

Jump to: navigation, search

Contents

Simple Description

Peer Reviews is a practice that involves work being reviewed by a "peer" (team-mate, lead, manager, etc.).

Primary Name

Peer Reviews

Also Known As

Code Reviews, Work Product Review

Core Process

Spans the whole core process: Requirements, Build, and Publish

Purpose

Ensure accuracy, acceptability and conformance (i.e. Quality).

Implementations

Spot Checks

Informal Reviews

Formal Reviews

Pairing

Automated Reviews

Description

Peer reviewing is a generic practice that involves the independent review of "work" by "peers." Work may be code, documentation, schedules, plans, budgets, etc. Work is merely some form of output that can be independently reviewed. A "peer" may be any co-worker, an external organization, or even a computer (for automated reviews). The idea behind peer reviews is to the need to independently check and verify the work produced.

Reviews may be used for conformance (such as code style, document style, template usage, etc.), for bug finding (such as in code or in legal terminology in contracts, etc.), for acceptance (such as policy reviews, etc.), or any other quality-based checks. Even testing can be considered a peer review, though it's treated differently (see Testing).

Personal tools